What is good science reporting? Not just raw science and not politicized science. Equations or alarmism won’t substitute for critical thinking when presenting science to citizens.

Science journalism now falls way “below the bar”, hiding bad science and promoting alarmist politicized scientists. But some journalists are not bowing to this group think.

With recent medical frauds, social science bias, climate hyping, and nature fakery … critics are saying: Enough! … of this abuse of science for political, moral and personal ideologies. And it seems the rebellion is spreading ![]()
The BBC and Climate Change: A Triple Betrayal - UK Dail Mail (8 Dec 2011) Above all, the BBC has been guilty of abusing the trust of its audience, and of all those compelled to pay for it. On one of the most important and far-reaching issues of our time, its coverage has been so tendentious that it has given its viewers a picture not just misleading but at times even fraudulent,” Christopher Booker said.


The BBC: less trustworthy, more dangerous than a cannibal polar bear - UK Telegraph (8 Dec 2011) – … when a man of Attenborough’s stature, popularity and apparent reasonableness trots out a line on television many of his audience will be inclined to believe him, regardless of whether what he’s saying is gospel truth or nonsense on stilts. And in the case of last night’s Frozen Planet it was mostly the latter.
Across the Atlantic, and up in the Arctic, the science versus journalism debate is (dare I say it?) heating up

Continue reading



































































































